We look at Alfred the Great and how Wessex survives the Viking invasions from 870-878.
7 Alfred the Great and the fight for survival
The History of England
In 870 the Great Heathen Army turns its attention to Wessex. The first campaign of 871 sees 9 battles fought, and Alfred the Great suceed his brother Athelred to the throne of Wessex. Although Wessex wins the battle of Ashdown, it has little overall impact, and Alfred is defeated at Basing, Wilton, and Maredun. In the end, Alfred pays the Vikings to go away, and the they have been to fight so hard that they agree.
But they are back in 878, and reduce Alfred to his closest thegns in the marsh at Athelney. In his famous fightback, Alfred rebuilds Anglo Saxon confidence with a series of raids; pulls together the fyrds of Somerset, Wiltshsire and Hampshire and defeats the Vikings in a decisive battle at Ethandun.
There's a slightly odd bit of treaty that survives between Alfred and Guthrum. It does help us understand the division of lands - but spends most of its time demonstrating that Dane and Anglo Saxon are of equal value before the law.

I'm getting a bit behind with this series, but enjoying it still. I'm here at part 7.
I was interested by your comments regarding the usefulness of well-researched historical novels. Generally I prefer historical novels in which real historical characters are in the background, such as Sansom's Shardlake series, to those in which real people from the past take centre stage. Having said that, Bernard Cornwell is very good at what he does, and the less known information there is about a figure from history the greater the need to employ the historical imagination. Where evidence is in short supply even the most cautious academics, some of whom may be critical of their novelist counterparts, are forced to fall back on informed speculation. I will keep an eye out for Cornwell's Saxon series.
On the subject of research, would it be possible to add a list of your key sources to the site? It is always useful to know where writers get their facts from and what might have influenced their opinions.
Posted by: David73277 | Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 11:57 AM
I love the Shardlake novels too; and I agree it is a bit risky to have characters that we recognise, because we tend to have our own image of what they are like. But Cornwell does it brilliantly. And he uses the freedom to speculate that the novelist has, and the historian doesn't have, really weel and intelligently.
I'd be happy to do a bibliography - I'll blog it.
Posted by: The History of England | Monday, March 21, 2011 at 08:58 PM
I have just come across you on iTunes. And I've spent many a happy hour in my car listening. There is still much for me to catch up on but I wanted to thank you for a wonderful series.
Posted by: Dragon09 | Monday, January 30, 2012 at 01:03 AM
Wonderful podcast, which I just began this past week. Much catching up to do. Greatly appreciate your observations about good historical fiction. It's arguable that all history of England from the Roman departure until the Norman Conquest is historical fiction. Or at least historical conjecture. I very much look forward to catching up.
Posted by: Laurence Bachmann | Sunday, June 17, 2012 at 06:03 PM
Thanks all ! And yes, a very interesting point. It's one of the reason that I love the Anglo Saxon age so much - there is so much room for interpreting the facts in a different way. And the fiction point is particularly true of Alfred, who comes down to us as a veritable paragon - and just possibly maybe perhaps because he controlled so much of what we do know about him. Any way, welcome!
Posted by: The History of England | Sunday, June 17, 2012 at 07:05 PM